Skip to Content, Navigation, or Footer.
The Eagle
Delivering American University's news and views since 1925
Monday, Dec. 23, 2024
The Eagle

Staff editorial: O' Christmas tree, er, O' holiday tree...

Debate is raging again this year over whether Christmas trees should be given a more innocuous name: holiday trees.

Proponents site America's pluaralistic society as a reason to try and include as many people as possible in the festivities. The opponents of such an idea are mostly Christians, who make up 76% of the U.S. population, according to recent statistics.

Retail giant Wal-Mart, as well as other stores have dropped the word "Christmas" from advertisements and in-store banners. Some consumers are so upset they have threatened to boycott the offending retailers.

Congress has even stepped into the fray, with House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert formally proclaiming the tree on the Capitol grounds as a Christmas tree. We think Congress has more important issues on their plate such as Iraq and Katrina, than wrangling over what to call a tree.

Christmas is of course a Christian holiday, hence the name, but many of the activities surrounding Dec. 25 are not religious in nature. Those Americans that are not particulary religious should also be able to join in the revelry, but those Americans that want to honor and recognize the birth of Jesus Christ should be able to celebrate the day regardless of the name, as it's hardly what matters.


Section 202 hosts Connor Sturniolo and Gabrielle McNamee are joined by fellow Eagle staff member and phenomenal sports photographer, Josh Markowitz. Follow along as they discuss the United Football League and the benefits it provides for the world of professional football.


Powered by Solutions by The State News
All Content © 2024 The Eagle, American Unversity Student Media