While I understand Ms. Lincoln's frustration at the different challenges faced by the different genders, I think it is important to focus on the big picture. In the case of the HPV vaccine, that big picture is the more than 11,000 women who will be diagnosed with cervical cancer in 2008. HPV is the most common sexually transmitted infection, and cervical cancer is the second biggest cancer killer of women worldwide. The FDA's approval of the HPV vaccine is an incredible scientific breakthrough which all women would be wise to take advantage of. Women should do their own research about the HPV vaccine and talk to their doctor since so many misconceptions exist, including some perpetuated in Ms. Lincoln's opinion piece last week. For example, clinical trials are already underway to discover if the vaccine is safe for men, and only a handful of states have included the HPV vaccine in the school immunization requirements.
However, I think the most troubling thing about the article is the author's negative attitude. Ms. Lincoln says students should direct their activism to "focus more on men and boys", going so low as to label the entire male population as "virus-spreading egoists." I find her anger over this issue not only confusing but counter-productive. The problems of sexual health in this country will never be solved if people such as Ms. Lincoln continue to point fingers and call names.
There are countless numbers of men who are careful to protect their partners and themselves by using condoms and dental dams, who drive their girlfriends to their appointments for the HPV vaccine, and yes, even some who will help pay for part of the high cost. We could achieve far more if we encouraged and celebrated such examples instead of getting angry over the negative actions of the few. Ultimately, each of us must take responsibility for our own sexual health, but we should consider each other partners in the struggle to create a more healthy society not enemies.
Ashley Evans Director, Women's Initiative
